<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: is_object function for javascript</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digimantra.com/technology/javascript/is-object-function-for-javascript/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digimantra.com/technology/javascript/is-object-function-for-javascript/</link>
	<description>Technology tips for all</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 21:00:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sachin Khosla</title>
		<link>http://www.digimantra.com/technology/javascript/is-object-function-for-javascript/#comment-4456</link>
		<dc:creator>Sachin Khosla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digimantra.com/?p=1646#comment-4456</guid>
		<description>that was quick and and that very quickly updated the code. 
Thanks for sharing info</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that was quick and and that very quickly updated the code.<br />
Thanks for sharing info</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HB</title>
		<link>http://www.digimantra.com/technology/javascript/is-object-function-for-javascript/#comment-4454</link>
		<dc:creator>HB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digimantra.com/?p=1646#comment-4454</guid>
		<description>The backwards ternary operator is unnecessary, if your expression returns true the ternary returns false, and vice versa. Why not just:

return (typeof(obj)==&#039;object&#039;)

That&#039;s already boolean, and the actual answer you&#039;re checking for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The backwards ternary operator is unnecessary, if your expression returns true the ternary returns false, and vice versa. Why not just:</p>
<p>return (typeof(obj)==&#8217;object&#8217;)</p>
<p>That&#8217;s already boolean, and the actual answer you&#8217;re checking for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
